3 minute read

Dialectical Theory

Conclusion

A social dialectical perspective has been employed in understanding a wide range of relationship types, including platonic friendships, polygamous families, abusive families, stepfamilies, friendships among coworkers, marital couples, romantic pairs, couple relationships with their social network, the relationships between parents and their adolescent children, the post-divorce relationship between exspouses, and families who face a dying member.

Dialectical researchers have used a variety of methods studying contradictions. Some scholars have used in-depth interviews in which relationship parties are asked simply to talk about the details of their relationship without explicit attention focused on contradictions; these interviews are subsequently analyzed by the researcher for evidence of contradiction. Other scholars have used in-depth interviewing to probe relationship parties explicitly about their awareness of, and reactions to, contradictions. Sometimes, dialectically oriented researchers have employed narrative analysis of stories of relating told by participants. Other dialectically oriented researchers have employed traditional survey methods to solicit parties' perceptions of the extent to which they experience dialectical tensions. Field-based ethnography has also been employed by dialectically oriented researchers. Finally, some dialectical researchers have coded the communicative behaviors of interacting partners for dialectical oppositions. Clearly, there is no single way to study the contradictions of relating.

Social-dialectics theories are not traditional deductive, axiomatic theories that attempt to explain cause-and-effect relations in the world, nor are they suitable for traditional hypothesis-testing. Social-dialectics theories instead typify what Jonathan Turner calls descriptive/sensitizing theories; that is, "loosely assembled congeries of concepts intended only to sensitize and orient researchers to certain critical processes" (1986, p. 11). Thus, the evaluative question to ask about social-dialectics theories is not whether their explanations are correct but whether they are useful in rendering relationships intelligible.


Bibliography

Altman, I.; Vinsel, A.; and Brown, B. (1981). "Dialectic Conceptions in Social Psychology: An Application to Social Penetration and Privacy Regulation." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, ed. L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.

Baxter, L. A. (1990). "Dialectical Contradictions in Relationship Development." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 7:69–88.


Baxter, L. A. (1993). "The Social Side of Personal Relationships: A Dialectical Analysis." In Social Context and Relationships, ed. S. Duck. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Baxter, L. A., and Erbert, L. A. (1999). "Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Turning Points of Development in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 16:547–569.

Baxter, L. A., and Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & Dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.

Bochner, A. P., and Eisenberg, E. (1987). "Family Process: System Perspectives." In Handbook of Communication Science, ed. C. R. Berger and S. Chaffee. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Braithwaite, D. O.; Baxter, L. A.; and Harper, A. M. (1998). "The Role of Rituals in the Management of the Dialectical Tension of 'Old' and 'New' in Blended Families." Communication Studies 49:101–120.

Brown, B. B.; Werner, C. M.; and Altman, I. (1998). "Choice Points for Dialecticians: A Dialectical-Transactional Perspective on Close Relationships." In Dialectical Approaches to Studying Personal Relationships, ed. B. M. Montgomery and L. A. Baxter. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conville, R. L. (1991). Relational Transitions. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Dindia, K. (1998). "'Going Into and Coming Out of the Closet': The Dialectics of Stigma Disclosure." In Dialectical Approaches to Studying Personal Relationships, ed. B. M. Montgomery and L. A. Baxter. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Goldsmith, D. (1990). "A Dialectical Perspective on the Expression of Autonomy and Connection in Romantic Relationships." Western Journal of Communication 54:537–556.

Montgomery, B. M. (1993). "Relationship Maintenance Versus Relationship Change: A Dialectical Dilemma." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10:205–224.

Montgomery, B. M., and Baxter, L. A., eds. (1998). Dialectical Approaches to Studying Personal Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pawlowski, D. R. (1998). "Dialectical Tensions in Marital Partners' Accounts of Their Relationships." Communication Quarterly 46:396–416.

Rawlins, W. K. (1983). "Openness as Problematic in Ongoing Friendships: Two Conversational Dilemmas." Communication Monographs 50:1–13.

Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship Matters: Communication, Dialectics, and the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Turner, J. H. (1986). The Structure of Sociological Theory, 4th edition. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

VanLear, C. A. (1998). "Dialectic Empiricism: Science and Relationship Metaphors." In Dialectical Approaches to Studying Personal Relationships, ed. B. M. Montgomery and L. A. Baxter. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Werner, C. M., and Baxter, L. A. (1994). "Temporal Qualities of Relationships: Organismic, Transactional and Dialectical Views." In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 2nd edition, ed. M. L. Knapp and G.
R. Miller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

LESLIE A. BAXTER

Additional topics

Marriage and Family EncyclopediaFamily Theory & Types of FamiliesDialectical Theory - Relating As A Process Of Contradiction, Contradictions And Change, Communication And Contradictions, Conclusion