6 minute read

Equity

Conclusion

Equity theory has provided a solid framework for examining perceived fairness in close relationships. Research has focused mainly on heterosexual romantic relationships because of the close link between the development, implementation, and perpetuation of fairness rules in this type of relationship with expectations and perceptions of gender roles. Some theorists disagree with the assumption that close, personal relationships should be based upon calculated inputs and outcomes, whereas other researchers support the idea that, at least for marriages, partners should be vigilant to ensure that both spouses benefit equally from the relationship. Although equity theory has long been associated with the fairness rule of proportionality, the rule of equality is also compatible with equity theory, and research examining the use of this rule in close relationships provides a substantial body of literature in support of the theory.

Equity theory states that when inequity exists, relational parties become distressed. Support is mixed regarding whether participants in overbenefiting or underbenefiting relationships suffer the same type or extent of distress. Distress arising from perceived inequities in marital relationships has been the focus of researchers using the equality rule. In particular, women in inequitable marital relationships report more psychological and physical symptoms, such as headaches and depression, whereas men seem to suffer emotional detachment and relational boredom. Although equality researchers tend to assume victims of inequity will psychologically adjust their perceptions to believe that no injustice exists, little research exists to support this assumption. In fact, little research examines how partners set about reestablishing equity in their relationships at all, although negative relational behaviors such as extramarital affairs and violence have been explored.

Surprisingly, not much research has examined equity theory in family relationships, intercultural relationships, or other close relationships such as friendships. However, the research that has been conducted shows promising results for equity theory. As changes in society continue, their impact on close relationships will surely continue to affect expectations and perceptions of fairness. Beliefs about fairness are bound in cultural and political ideologies. As global communications become easier and international boundaries shrink, interpersonal relationships will become a greater focus for researchers. Fairness rules and their appropriateness and application to different types of relationships will no doubt continue to be a central theme.


Bibliography

Bernard, J. S. (1972). The Future of Marriage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Blaisure, K. R., and K. R. Allen. (1995). "Feminists and the Ideology and Practice of Marital Equity." Journal of Marriage and the Family 57(1):5–20.

Blumstein, P., and P. Schwartz. (1983). American Couples: Money, Work, Sex. New York: Morrow.

Bryant, A .S. (2001). Relationships Between Domestic Violence, Abuse, and Gender-Equity Perceptions: A Study of the Appalachian Region of Kentucky. Ed.D. diss., University of Louisville.

Clark, M. S., and K. Chrisman. (1994). "Resource Allocation in Intimate Relationships: Trying to Make Sense of a Confusing Literature." In Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, ed. M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula. New York: Plenum Press.

Clark, M. S., and J. Mills. (1979). "Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:12–24.

Coltrane, S. (1996). Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Coltrane, S., and E. O. Valdez. (1993). "Reluctant Compliance: Work-Family Role Allocation in Dual-Earner Chicano Families." In Men, Work, and Family, ed. J. Hood. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Desmarais, S., and M. J. Lerner. (1994). "Entitlements in Close Relationships: A Justice-Motive Analysis." In Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, ed. M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula. New York: Plenum Press.

Deutsch, M. (1975). "Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?" Journal of Social Issues 31:137–149.

Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Gove, W. R.; Hughes, M.; and Style, C. B. (1983). "Does Marriage Have Positive Effects on the Psychological Well-Being of the Individual?" Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24:122–131.

Gray-Little, B., and N. Burks. (1983). "Power and Satisfaction in Marriage: A Review and Critique." Psychological Bulletin 93:513–538.

Handel, G. (1986). "Beyond Sibling Rivalry: An Empirically Grounded Theory of Sibling Relationships." Sociological Studies of Child Development 1:105–122.

Hochschild, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.

John, D.; Shelton, B.A.; and Luschen, K. (1995). "Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Perceptions of Fairness." Journal of Family Issues 16:357–379.

Kaufman, M. (1994). "Men, Feminism, and Men's Contradictory Experiences of Power." In Theorizing Masculinity, ed. H. Brod and M. Kaufman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Keil, L. J., and McClintock, C. G. (1983). "A Developmental Perspective on Distributive Justice." In Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, ed. D. M. Messick and K. S. Cook. New York: Praeger Publishers.

Kluwer, E.; Heeskink, J. A. M.; and Van de Vliert, E. (1996). "Marital Conflict about the Division of Household Labor and Paid Work." Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:958–969.

Knudson-Martin, C., and Mahoney, A. R. (1998). "Language and Processes in the Construction of Equality in New Marriages." Family Relations 47(1):81–92.

Murstein, B. I., Cerreto, M.; and MacDonald, M. G. (1977). "A Theory and Investigation of the Effect of Exchange-Orientation on Marriage and Friendships." Journal of Marriage and the Family 39:543–548.

Regan, P. C., and Sprecher, S. (1995). "Gender Differences in the Value of Contributions to Intimate Relationships: Egalitarian Relationships are Not Always Perceived to be Equitable." Sex Roles 33(3/4):221–238.

Rogers, M. L., and Bird, C. E. (1998). "Do Gender Differences in the Effects of Equity in Paid Work and Household Labor on Depression Hold across Ethnic and Racial Groups?" Paper read at Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California.

Scanzoni, L. D., and Scanzoni, J. (1988). Men, Women and Change, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer Marriage: How Love Between Equals Really Works. New York: Free Press.

Silberstein, L. (1992). Dual-Career Marriage: A System in Transition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sprecher, S. (1992). "How Men and Women Expect to Feel and Behave in Response to Inequity in Close Relationships." Social Psychology Quarterly 55(1):57–69.

Sprecher, S. (1995). "Equity and Close Relationships." In Encyclopedia of Marriage and the Family, ed. D. Levinson. New York: Macmillan.

Sprecher, S. (1998). "The Effect of Exchange Orientation on Close Relationships." Social Psychology Quarterly 61(3):220–231.

Steil, J., and Weltman, K. (1991). "Marital Inequality: The Importance of Resources, Personal Attributes, and Social Norms on Career Valuing and the Allocation of Domestic Responsibilities." Sex Roles 24(3/4):161–179.

Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital Equality: Its Relationship to the Well-Being of Husbands and Wives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Steil, J. M., and Turetsky, B. A. (1987). "Is Equal Better? The Relationship between Marital Equality and Psychological Symptomatology." Applied Social Psychology Annual 7:73–97.

Stum, M. S. (1999). "'I Just Want to be Fair': Interpersonal Justice in Intergenerational Transfers of Non-Titled Property." Family Relations 48(2):159–166.

Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.

VanYperen, N. W., and Buunk, B. P. (1991). "Equity Theory: Communal and Exchange Orientation in Cross-Cultural Perspective." Journal of Social Psychology 131:5–20.

VanYperen, N. W., and Buunk, B. P. (1994). "Social Comparison and Social Exchange in Marital Relationships." In Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, edited by M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula. New York: Plenum Press.

Vogl-Bauer, S.; Kalbfleisch, P. J.; and Beatty, M. J. (1999). "Perceived Equity, Satisfaction, and Relational Maintenance Strategies in Parent-Adolescent Dyads." Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28(1):27–49.

Walster, E.; Walster, G. W.; and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Wells, K. B.; Kataoka, S. H.; and Asarnow, J. R. (2001). "Affective Disorders in Children and Adolescents: Addressing Unmet Need in Primary Care Settings." Biological Psychiatry 49(12):1111–1120.

ALAINA M. WINTERS

Additional topics

Marriage and Family EncyclopediaFamily Theory & Types of FamiliesEquity - The Scope Of Equity Theory And Close Relationships, Overview Of Equity Theory, Conclusion