3 minute read

Marital Typologies

Conclusion



Though there are limitations to the existing marital typologies, the current systems are more useful in describing marriage relationships than no system at all. The ongoing challenge is to refine a classification system and encourage scholars to adopt the typology. Though these challenges may seem daunting, it is important to realize that marital scholarship is yet in its infancy. As the field refines its methods, develops more continuity, and wrestles with the challenges of developing a good typology, the ability to classify marriages in useful and a commonly accepted manner will emerge.




Bibliography

Allen, W. (1997). "Replication of Five Types with African American Couples Based on ENRICH." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Bodenmann, G.; Gottman, J. M.; and Backman, H. (1997). "A Swiss Replication of Gottman's Couple Typology." Swiss Journal of Psychology 56:205–216.


Burgess, E. W., and Locke, H. J. (1945). The Family: From Institution to Companionship. New York: American Book Company.

Chang, J. S. (1999). "Scripting Extramarital Affairs: Marital Mores, Gender Politics, and Infidelity in Taiwan." Modern China 25:69–99.


Cohen, O.; Finzi, R.; and Avi-Yonah, O. (1999). "At Attachment-Based Typology of Divorcing Couples." Family Therapy 26:167–190.


Crouter, A. C., and Manke, B. (1997). "Development of a Typology of Dual-Earner Families: A Window into Differences between and within Families in Relationships, Roles, and Activities." Journal of Family Psychology 11:62–75.

Cuber, J. F., and Harroff, P. B. (1965). Sex and the Significant Americans. New York: Penguin Books.

Dickson, F. C. (1995). "The Best is Yet to Be: Research on Long-Lasting Marriages." In Under-Studied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track, ed. J. T. Wood and S. Duck. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce: The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gottman, J. M., and Levenson, R. W. (1992). "Marital Processes Predictive of Later Dissolution." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1999). The Marriage Clinic. New York: W.W. Norton.

Hall, C. S., and Lindzey, G. (1985). Introduction to Theories of Personality. New York: Wiley.

Hortacsu, N. (1999). "The First Year of Family- and Couple-Initiated Marriages of a Turkish Sample: A Longitudinal Investigation." International Journal of Psychology 34:29–41.

Huston, T. L.; McHale, S. J.; and Crouter, A. C. (1986). "When the Honeymoon's Over: Changes in the Marriage Relationship Over the First Year." In The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships, ed. R. Gilmour and S. Duck. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Levinger, G. (1965). "Marital Cohesiveness and Dissolution: An Integrative Review." Journal of Marriage and the Family 27:19–28.

Lewis, R. A., and Spanier, G. B. (1979). "Theorizing About the Quality and Stability of Marriage." In Contemporary Theories About the Family, Vol. 1, ed. W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. Nye, and L. Reiss. New York: Free Press.

Olson, D. H., and Fowers, B. J. (1993). "Five Types of Marriage: An Empirical Typology Based on ENRICH." Family Journal 1:196–207.

Roberts, L. J., and Leonard, K. E. (1998). "An Empirical Typology of Drinking Partnerships and Their Relationship to Marital Functioning and Drinking Consequences." Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:515–526.

Rosenfeld, L. B.; Bowen, G. L.; and Richman, J. M. (1995). "Communication in Three Types of Dual-Career Marriages." In Explaining Family Interactions, ed. M. A. Fitzpatrick and A. L. Vangelisti. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Snyder, D. K., and Smith, G. T. (1986). "Classification of Marital Relationships: An Empirical Approach." Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:137–146.

Willcox, W. F. (1892). Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law. New York: Columbia University.

EDGAR C. J. LONG JEFFREY J. ANGERA

Additional topics

Marriage and Family EncyclopediaFamily Theory & Types of FamiliesMarital Typologies - Elements Of A Good Typology Of Marriage, The Proliferation Of Marriage-related Typologies, Using Logical Methods To Create Typologies